Differences in security of payment legislation in each state
Each state has its own security of payment legislation; the primary goal of which is to ensure that contractors and subcontractors in the construction industry are paid for the work that they perform and that payment is made on time, without the need for costly and lengthy litigation, where entitlement is disputed.
Effectively, security of payment adopts a ‘pay now, argue later’ approach, which is achieved by the establishment of a mandatory adjudication scheme for interim resolution of payment claim disputes.
Security of payment runs concurrently alongside entitlements under the construction contract, and claims for payment can proceed to adjudication even if the formal dispute resolution procedure under the construction contract has commenced.
Whilst the overall purpose of each of the statutes is the same, there are important differences that claimants and respondents need to be familiar with, otherwise they run the risk of falling into the trap of missing a deadline or a mandatory requirement.
For ease of reference, the differences between each of the states have been compared in the tables below.
It is worth noting that changes will be made to security of payment disputes in New South Wales by the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Amendment Act 2018 (NSW) (the Amendment Act) which commences on 21 October 2019 but only relates to contracts that are entered into after 21 October 2019. Please see our article “Changes to New South Wales Security of Payment” for a comprehensive breakdown of the effects on the amendments to the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW).
Differences in requirements for valid payment claim
| Requirement | New South Wales (pre 21 October 2019) | New South Wales (post 21 October 2019) | ACT | Victoria | Queensland |
| Identify construction work (or related goods and services) to which it relates | |||||
| Indicate / specify monetary amount claimed | |||||
| Be served on person, who is or may be liable to make payment | |||||
| State that it is made under the Act | Only if it is connected with an exempt residential construction contract | ||||
| Be the first payment claim in respect of a reference date under the contract | |||||
| Be in writing |
Differences in timeframes for submitting a claim and being paid
| New South Wales & ACT | Victoria | Queensland |
| Later of: | Later of: |
Differences in timeframes for being paid
| New South Wales (pre 21 October 2019) | New South Wales (post 21 October 2019) | ACT & Victoria | Queensland |
| Earlier of : | Earlier of : |
Differences in timeframes for respondents to issue a payment schedule disputing a payment claim
| New South Wales, ACT & Victoria | Queensland |
Earlier of:
| The shorter of the following periods:
|
Differences in requirements for valid payment schedule
| Requirement | New South Wales | ACT | Victoria | Queensland |
| Identify payment claim to which it relates | ||||
| Indicate / state amount of payment the respondent proposes to make | ||||
| Reason why payment is lower & why money is being withheld (if applicable) | ||||
| Identify amount of claim which is an excluded amount | ||||
| Include any other information prescribed / be in the prescribed form | Note – Nothing currently prescribed | |||
| Be in writing |
Differences in timeframes for making an adjudication application
| Type of Adjudication Application | New South Wales & ACT | Victoria | Queensland |
| Disputed amount indicated on a payment schedule (but undisputed amount paid) | Within 10 business days following receipt of the payment schedule. | Within 10 business days following receipt of the payment schedule. | Within 30 business days following receipt of the payment schedule |
| Respondent failing to pay the whole or any part of the scheduled amount by the due date (after providing a payment schedule) | Within 20 business days following the due date for payment. | Within 10 business days following the due date for payment. | Within 20 business days following the due date for payment |
| Respondent fails to provide a payment schedule and fails to pay the whole or any part of the claimed amount by the due date | With 30 business days after the later of: |
Differences in the requirements for making a valid adjudication application
| Requirements | New South Wales | ACT | Victoria | Queensland |
| Be issued to: | An ANA selected by the claimant. | An ANA selected by the claimant. |
| The Registrar by a claimant. |
| Relate to a valid payment claim under the Act | ||||
| Be in the approved form / prepared in accordance with the regulations | ||||
| Be in writing | ||||
| Identify the payment claim and schedule (if any) | ||||
| Accompanied by an application fee (if any) | ||||
| Be served on the respondent |
If you have:
- been served with a payment claim;
- are not being paid by a contractor or principal; or
- simply need some clarifications as to processes by which to get paid in a timely manner,
contact Dark Legal on the details below for a free consultation.
1 comments